Homepage|Complaints|Right of Reply|Lighter Side|Voting Station|Sounding Board

 


CONSUMER COMMENT/COMPLAINT


TOWN & COUNTRY INSTALLATIONS

DATE:
3 December 2003

CONSUMER:
Colin Burrows

RETURN TO ORIGINATING DEDICATED PAGE


Update to my entry dated 24th July 2003.

I have now received judgement in my favour in my case against Town and Country Installations Ltd., requiring them to repay all the money I paid to them for my driveway, plus my costs.

With regard to the Town and Country Driveways plc brochure, being used by Town and Country Installations Ltd. as their own. The judge states that I understandably believed that Town and Country Installations Ltd. 'was in fact a Company with a very different profile to Town and Country Installations Ltd., which was a company newly formed to take over the business of another liquidated Company'. He further states that 'This misbelief was understandably fostered by the untrue, indeed dishonest, suggestions and inferences which Town and Country Installations Ltd. literature gave'.

In the end the judge accepted that the driveway was not laid with reasonable skill and care, as the installed sub-base was not deep enough or compacted properly, so that the driveway has now developed cracks (three at time of writing).

The judge concluded that Town and Country Installations Ltd. was in breach of the implied terms under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, and therefore gave judgement in my favour.

One aspect the judge mentioned may be of use to other customers fighting Town and Country Installations Ltd. in Court, if Town and Country are attempting to use their Customer Satisfaction Form to prove that the installation had been accepted by the customer and was therefore satisfactory.

On this subject the judge stated that 'The suggestion that the Claimant signed a Satisfaction Certificate, that the excavation and base were satisfactory, in my judgement, is without merit'. He further states 'the Claimant was relying on the expertise of Town and Country Installations Ltd. as professed experts in concrete driveways, and how they expected a signature from an untrained customer to relieve them of liability for mis- or non-performance escapes me entirely'.

The expert witness appointed in the case was Mr. John Linley, Technical Manager of Pattern Imprinted Concrete Services Ltd. He was nominated by Town and Country Installations Ltd. - and somewhat surprisingly accepted by the judge, despite the fact that his company is a major supplier to Town and Country. (In this connection, it is interesting to note that at one poit Town and Country offered to have no expert evidence, on the grounds of disproportionate cost, when it appeared Mr. Linley might not be appointed, but then immediately back tracked when he was actually appointed, and again insisted on expert evidence to be provided by Mr. Linley).

With regard to Mr. Linley's evidence the judge said in his judgement that he has a number of disquiets about Mr. Linley's evidence: firstly, that the length of time that this case has taken to be disposed of was in large measure due to the delay caused by the expert's report; secondly, that Mr. Linley expressed an opinion on the excavation and preparation without taking core samples to ascertain the depth of concrete or the base below, an omission the judge says he finds surprising as he would have expected Mr. Linley to find out basic facts upon which to base an opinion before expressing an opinion on the adequacy of the base; and thirdly, given that Mr. Linley wrote to the Court to say that he has no expertise in concrete technology or the 'engineering related aspects of the matter' (and that his comments on such matters were 'of a personal nature and not backed by technical qualification or accreditation'), the judge states that he does not know why Mr. Linley was prepared to accept instructions or express opinions on issues of which he had no expertise, and that he was ignoring Mr. Linley's evidence.

I can supply a copy of my judgement on request as evidence, or to assist anyone else who is,or is contemplating taking this company, or any of the associated companies, such as Town and Country Driveways Ltd., to court.
Colin Burrows ... 3 December 2003

Download a copy of the Court Judgement (PDF File size = 260KB)

You need this free software to view the court judgement documents.
If it is not installed on your computer, click on the button to visit the Adobe site for a free copy.

Top of Page