Published:
10/06/2002
Right of Reply email sent:
10/06/2002

COMPANY RIGHT OF REPLY

 

We wait for a response from NTL



===========
Post your comments:

Consumer Comments

Share comments
and your experience of this company on the clik2complaints Sounding Board: Click Here

NTL
Coventry
Dedicated Page in the Public Domain
Complainant:
Ms S Kermode
Town/City of Residence:
Coventry

On 21/11/01 an NTL salesperson by the name of Mr Ryan (employee number XXX supplied) visited my home to discuss the benefits of an NTL package. Mr Ryan explained the features of NTL including the fact that NTL was in fact more economical than my existing telecommunications package as once a line was installed, all internet usage was at no charge. Further to this, he informed me that because I was living in the house for less than 12 months, as soon as I moved out my contract would be void. I was satisfied with his justifications and subscribed to NTL.

I was not connected to NTL until 30/01/02, at this point I ordered a cd to install NTL Internet and was informed of the 1-month waiting list. I had to keep my BT/Freeserve subscription in place at this time, as I require constant access. Over two months later I enquired about my cd and was informed that it had been despatched. After a further two phone calls and four months of paying my BT subscription as well as my NTL package, my cd arrived this morning. Upon instillation of the cd I became aware, for the first time that the Internet was chargeable. A conversation with NTL customer service representative revealed that in December last year NTL Internet became chargeable.

This occurred after I had signed a contract based on the information of their sales representative but before instillation took place. At no point was I contacted to inform me of this change, as had I been I would have cancelled the instillation because these charges make NTL more expensive than the system that I had originally operated.
After having waited four months for an internet connection cd, whilst paying both BT and Freeserve subscriptions I am disgusted to find changes have been made to my package without being informed.

This situation has cost me over £100 in extra charges and has proved most inconvenient.

Further to these problems, I have now found that when I move out next month, I will have to continue to pay my subscription charges, despite being told that my contract would be void as soon as I moved out.

I am clearly a victim of a corrupt salesman, but NTL accept no liability for these 'cowboys' which they are employing and I am seriously out of pocket as a result of it.

I have contacted NTL several times by telephone complaining about this situation, they tell me to write to the complaints department who in turn do not reply to my letters.

Links to other NTL complaints



  Editorial Comments

We all know of NTL's reputation on Customer Service, delays etc, but this is a totally new ball game. This belongs in the public domain!

A right of reply email has been sent to Customer Care Manager- Cliff Grundy and Pete Savage both of NTL.



=================================

previously submitted Consumer Comments
[Important: Read Disclaimer]

NTL have the worse customer service operatives. They say yes to every question just to get you off the phone, all the yes that you were promised never happen suprise suprise. I was charged double for my installation, what happened - computer fault off course. Channels stop working - computer fault.

I now cancelled by TV, question will my TV package channels work during my one month notice period answer yes. Reality three quarters of my package channels stop working the very next day, that is 2 days in to cancellation notice period. Suprise suprise.

Unfriendly staff, poor service, unhelpful, not knowledged, etc etc etc. Try out sourcing Customer Service to India - you might 100% improvement, or at least knowledged, friendly, educated, and willing to help staff....NTL you have a lot to learn. Manoj Khatri .. 2 January 2004
-------------------------------------------------

Why is it easier to upgrade than down grade? I wish to down grade to family pack only. Paul...7 April 2003
--------------------------------------------------
Disgraceful! Antony Edwards ... 20 July 2003
--------------------------------------------------
I am planning to get NTL:home 600k broadband internet
..... I have read many pleasing articles and happy customers. Should I succeed and get it? I find it appalling what you have been through. Thanks.
Brian Davies ... 18 September 2003
---------------------------------------------------
This evening - October 15th 2003, I inquired about moving an NTL junction box in my lounge, as we are having some building works done.

I was originally advised that this would cost 50. When I subsequently asked for an appointment for your engineers to carry out this work, after waiting on line for a few minutes, I was told that this service was no longer available.

Further conversation with the manager - KM - informed me that I was misinformed by his colleague.- the service was still available, but now the cost would be 100. 50 call out, 50 to carry out the job.

I then asked the cost of installation, and was told it was 50 plus 20 - a total of 70. I suggested that it was unreasonable to charge more to provide a service for an existing customer. After all, if I cancelled my current NTL subscription, I could then have a new one installed in the correct location for less money.
I was told, however, that there was no guarantee that the 2 jobs would be co-ordinated to coincide. I asked to speak to the installations manager, but was told that this was not possible.

As an existing customer I feel that it is unfair to charge such amounts for a very simple task. My electrician advises me that this is an extremely basic job - He is unable to tackle it because he cannot take the risk of NTL suggesting any damage to the equipment.

I have been a NTL customer for many years and have never been satisified with their service and unfulfiled promises. This case is typical.
Liz Papier ... 15 October 2003
-------------------------------------------
On the evening of - October 15th 2003,
I inquired about moving an NTL junction box in my lounge, as we are having some building works done.
I was originally advised that this would cost 50. When I subsequently asked for an appointment for your engineers to carry out this work, after waiting on line for a few minutes, I was told that this service was no longer available.
Further conversation with the manager - Kevin McTeer - informed me that I was misinformed by his colleague.- the service was still available, but now the cost would be 100. 50 call out, 50 to carry out the job.I then asked the cost of installation, and was told it was 50 plus 20 - a total of 70.

I suggested that it was unreasonable to charge more to provide a service for an existing customer. After all, if I cancelled my current NTL subscription, I could then have a new one installed in the correct location for less money.
I was told, however, that there was no guarantee that the 2 jobs would be co-ordinated to coincide. I asked to speak to the installations manager, but was told that this was not possible.

As an existing customer I feel that it is unfair to charge such amounts for a very simple task. My electrician advises me that this is an extremely basic job - He is unable to tackle it because he cannot take the risk of NTL suggesting any damage to the equipment.
I have been a NTL customer for many years and have never been satisified with their service and unfulfiled promises. This case is typical.
Liz Papier, Edgware...15 October 2003
--------------------------------------------
In feb 1999 I had just moved into 20 Trefoil house (previous address) and NTL was then offering a Combined TV and Phone deal. NTL installed the TV and then a day later told me the phones could not get into my area. WITHOUT NTL the deal, I was better off sticking with my current suppliers by using separate TV and Phone provider(s).

So I requested NTL to removed TV the FOLLOWING DAY after installation which they did remove. However I got a bill of 2.00 for a service I did not use. I was charged for something I did not use How can I pay for something I did not use?

I wrote to them explaining/complaining about the situation and was told it was written off. So I assumed everything was sorted out. However for the 1st time on my credit file I have seen that NTL STILL actually CLAIMS I have defaulted in paying and still owe them 2!!!. Why NTL still has this record TO DATE stating I STILL owe them 2.00 and that I defaulted to paying the 2.00 I cannot understand.

NTL has dettered my Credit File, by saying I defaulted in paying for something I did not use. I want NTL to take that FALSE data off my credit file and a formal letter stating that they have done so. I am really furious that 4 years down the line they still say I owe what I do not owe.
AMEZE ODARO ... 23 October 2003
-------------------------------------------------
We had a flyer through the door from NTL say that if we subscribed to NTL's cable service we would have high speed access to the web
, cheap phone calls and loads of extra TV channals, all in time for Christmas. I rang the to find out when I could have this super package!

The following conversation took place " Hello, I'm intrested in the package you have on offer, can you give me more details","Yes Sir, What's your postcode?" Gave her my postcode". " There is one small thing", " Yes Sir, what is that?","Well it's November, we are not cabled in this area, how are you going to get this set up for Christmas?". "Just a minute Sir",long break "Hello Sir, I'm sorry but this is a mistake we will not be able to offer you this service". "Oh I'm sorry to hear that, when will NTL be able to do so?","We will be cabling up you area at the end of next year". "So we will be able to have the service next year for Christmas then?" ,"Yes Sir"

That was 8 years ago and we still don't have cable. So if you are hoping for NTL to do anything quickly, think again.
Chris ... Weston-super-Mare - 1 November 2003
---------------------------------------------------
We joined NTL because they had a promotional offer of free installation, we were also keen on taking up their offer of having a TV Base Pack plus telephone for 24.99 per month. However since joining, they overcharged for the installation. I complained to their customer services, who were very apologetic and gave us a few extra channels and promised that things would sorted out.

The next bil came and we again had been over-charged. We complained and were told that things would be sorted but then another bill came and once again we were overcharged. I asked NTL to provide a breakdown of the bill and write to us to explain the situation, they said that they couldn't do this as everything was electronically generated.

So to date, we have had payments coming out of our accounts for items that we have not purchased, yet they have done little to sort out the situation apart from making false promises. NTL are terrible - we wish we had stayed with BT ! Yusuf Dawood ... 4 November 2003
----------------------------------------------------



=====================================


NTL's proposed solution to its customer service issues
is to add yet another layer of bureaucracy to its ridiculous internal escalation process. It has devolved ultimate responsibility for customer service to regional areas. The chances of any complaint or issue being dealt with quickly or competently is now very slim.

I have put this to test regarding two key issues which will affect customers UK-wide. One was the mis-marketing of digital TV. Analogue users were enticed with the offer of free internet services thru their TV. This was without limit in the marketing information approved by the Advertising Standards Authority, however when interactive services were finally made available they introduced a charge for wider web access thru digital TV.

The second issue relates to NTLworld and the triple digital offer. Whilst NTL were billing £5 on a separate account for NTLWorld having notified everyone of the service becoming chargable, they were also charging £20.99 ! for a service called Triple Digital with NTLWorld. The excuse supplied was that this remained on the bill for accounting purposes?

I have asked repeatedly for full details of the terms and conditions for all of the related offers and services including the dates and notification media for alterations to the terms and conditions. Guess what NTL have failed to produce them.

I am now considering writing a book about NTL, for the corporate audience, on how not to get customer services wrong.
John Taggart... 17 September 2002
--------------------------------------------------

Please post your Consumer Comments on the
clik2complaints.co.uk Sounding Board