Published:
18/08/2001
Right of Reply email sent:
23/08/2001

COMPANY RIGHT OF REPLY

 



===========
Post your comments:

Consumer Comments

Share comments
and your experience of this company on the clik2complaints Sounding Board: Click Here

Comet Plc
Hull
Dedicated Page in the Public Domain
Complainant:
Stephen Snyders
Town/City of Residence:
Oxford


On 20.6.01, I went into the Cribbs Causeway Branch of Comet, Bristol to purchase a palmtop computer. The store suggested that I take out a 3 year service contract and a 6 month interest-free credit option. I was asked for my drivers license and debit card to process my application. Since my licence quite clearly stated a "care of" address, I requested that I give an alternate address for correspondence as I was about to move home, and the address stated on my license was not my home address either. I was told that the address what not important, and since I tend to move around alot, as an NHS employed doctor, numerous previous addresses would only make the application more complicated. (This is the reason I have a c/oa ddress stated on my license, but due to a further move out of the region a different address would be more appropriate!)

The 6-months interest free credit option suggested by the store was rejected, and on further investigation it would appear that the address supplied *is* highly significant.This is not what I was led to believe.

What concerns me, and is my reason for writing is Comet's attitude to my complaint. I have been blamed for the entire event. The customer services department have told me that I am at fault for providing them with incorrect information (I pointed out that the address was not incorrect, but was a c/o address and requested to give another, but was
told it was not important).

The finance company have told me to take the matter up with Comet as they were only able to do a search on the address supplied and thus cannot be held responsible. Comet tell me that it has nothing to do with them and that I should contact the finance company. The customer services manager, at Comet, who returned my call was agressive from the outset. Each time I tried to explain my point, I was literally shouted at, being told that I knew I wanted credit when I walked into the store and thus it was my responsibility to come prepared with the appropriate documentation. Clearly this was not the case, as I had no intention of applying for credit to purchase the item, and had been given the option once in the store. I was also led to believe that the address which was supplied was not an issue.

When I requested to speak with someone else as we were getting nowhere with her shouting at me down the telephone, I was told that she
was the only customer services manager at head office and there was no one else I could speak with. When I asked for the name of the managing director then, again I was shouted at and Mrs Lawrence refused to give
me his name by going off on a tangent and threatened to end the call. I was then told that if I were to write a letter of complaint that she would be the one to respond as her name has been tagged to my complaint, and
it would only state what she has said verbally - basically saying: "don't bother". After some more shouting, she did end the call!

What appalled me the most was that a customer services manager could be so rude to a potential client without any form of appology for the bad experience I had in the store irrespective of who was to blame!

After writing to the Managing director, I received a reply one month later! The content of the letter received was far from satisfactory, although it did contain several appologies, but with no feedback as to how Comet was prepared to rectify the matter. Upon stating that I was dissatisfied with his response in a further letter, I received another answering SOME of the points I had originally raised, but still not taking any responsibility for what had occurred and asking me to contact the credit reference agency, to pay £2 to obtain access to my files and even had the audacity to suggest that they would be happy to retain my custom "using another means of payment e.g. cash, or major credit card"!

I feel that Comet have not dealt with my telephonic complaint in a professional manner and even the managing director in a written response appears to have missed the points which are:

1. Coment are responsible for me having a record of a loan refusal.

2. Their customer services department have been exceedingly rude to a potential customer for which there can be no excuse (and apparently no appology!).

3. I have been greatly inconvenienced by this event and have made numerous telephone calls to national rate numbers in an attempt to rectify this matter, not to mention many hours of letter and email writing. The matter is far from over. I would expect any reasonable company to compensate a member of the public for any inconvenienced caused by them, but instead Comet have had the audacity to ask for another form of payment!

4. I would expect to be informed of the outcome of their "investigation" into the matter, but no mention of this had been made and no one from the store has made any attempt to contact me to explain or appologise. This leads me to feel that the matter may not have been taken as seriously as I feel it should be.

Other Comet Complaints



  Editorial Comments

We believe the customer has raised valid points in his complaint and a right of reply letter/ email has been issued to Comet.

update 12 September 2001
Dr Snyders has given his comments on Comet's response dated 28 August 2001:
"I fear that Comet have yet again missed the point of my complaint"......more.

The Editor draws attention to Comet's statement that "as a company we would of course expect that the matter is handled in a courteous and appropriate manner". Surely, that should go without saying. What we ask is "What are Comet's actions to address this apparent lapse"? The Editor also regards the following statement of Comet's policy as suspect indeed: All complaints made by customers are taken very seriously and internal investigations are always carried out, however these investigations and findings would remain internal". How then is Comet held accountable? How can the consumer be assured of fair and just treatment of his/her complaint?

update on 18 september 2001
Comet's response to Dr Snyders' comments here

Top of Page



=================================

previously submitted Consumer Comments
[Important: Read Disclaimer]

Please post your Consumer Comments on the
clik2complaints.co.uk Sounding Board