Published:
5/9/2002
Right of Reply email sent:
5/9/2002

COMPANY RIGHT OF REPLY

 


A Right of Reply letter has been issued



===========
Post your comments:

Consumer Comments

Share comments
and your experience of this company on the clik2complaints Sounding Board: Click Here

Cellular Operation Limited

Wiltshire
Dedicated Page in the Public Domain
Complainant:
Ms K Lean
Town/City of Residence:
Herts

I am writing to complain about not being adequately informed about the changes to my call tariff and the wrong information given by the service provider.

In October 2001, having bought two mobile phones from Dial-A-Phone Limited, Highgate Road, London, I took up a call plan with free 600 minutes off-peak call and 50 text messages. The main reason for selecting this 12-month contract (with Cellular Operation Limited) was that I am a frequent user of 0800, 0845 and 0970 numbers and these numbers were included in the ‘free 600 off-peak minutes’. Due to financial tightness, I monitor my calls closely every month. I also have registered with your on-line mobile account – ‘www.mymobiles.co.uk’.

In early July, I logged into my internet account, and I realised that some calls that were previously included in my free minutes (i.e. 0870-, 0800-, 0845 etc.) had been charged for from 1st July 2002. I contacted Cellular Operations Ltd to query this and the representative told me that none of my off-peak calls had been charged for, including specific calls made in July. I was told that 0800 numbers were still inclusive in the ‘free minutes’.

Later, when I received my phone bill on 1st August 2002, I was very surprised to see charges of £29.22 for the first mobile phone, and £42.59 for the second mobile phone. I expected these bills to amount to about £0.69 and £0.41 of charged calls, plus the monthly line rental of £11.99 each. My phone bills should therefore have been less than £20.00 each.

I believe that I was given incorrect advice in July, if I had been told that those calls had been chargable since 1st July, I would not have called any of the 0800, 0870 or 0845 numbers. I therefore called Cellular Operations Limited on 2nd August 2002. The representative on this occasion insisted that I had been informed about the changes within my March invoice. He also denied that there was a record of the queries I made to them in July (He said under my account record, I didn’t make any enquiries in July at all!). When I asked him about termination of my contract, as the changes to the Agreement were to my disadvantage, he insisted that I am liable to pay for the remaining line rental until the end of the initial 12-month period.

On calling on the 3rd August 2002, the representative stated that I was informed in June’s invoice about the changes. Again, June’s invoice does not advise this. The representative confirmed that my account record included the previous enquiries, but she denied that this was the operator’s mistake.

It is clear to me that the representatives I have dealt with have not been adequately advised about the service Cellular Operations Limited provides. I have also found them on occasion to be rude, unhelpful and impatient, with telephone messages frequently not being returned.

On 5th August, at my request, the St. Albans District Citizens Advised Bureau spoke with Mr Ian Payne who has established that the only notification I have received of the change in tariff is within the ‘frequently asked questions’ of my May invoice. However, the statement does not indicate when those calls (0800, 0870 & 0845) would be excluded from the ‘free minutes’.

I believe the notification provided was inadequate and I believe you have mislead me causing me to make calls worth £53.50 since 1st of July, which I would otherwise not have made.

I then wrote a complaint letter (as above) on 6th August to the cutomer relation's manager, I also requst for advise on what actions the company propose to take to address the confusion that appears to exist between their representatives in order to prevent similar occurrences in the future

I received the reply on 16 August, the representative, Mr. Kevin Rouse. I extreme disappointment at the content of the letter. The company attempt to blame Vodafone for the change in charging structure, is, as they have now acknowledged irrelevant as my contract is with Cellular Operation Limited and not Vodafone.

The suggestion in his reply that “As long as the information is supplied to our customers, it is then up to our customers’ discretion to read the information given. However it was supplied to you.”, I find insulting regardless of the legality of supplying information in ‘small print’. I would contend that the way of the specific information on 0800, 0870 and 0845 numbers was presented suggests unscrupulous and unprofessional practice on the company part, with the deliberate intention that customers would not normally be aware of the change.

Most importantly, I have been given the wrong information. As long as I understood from their representative in July’s phone call, the number 0800, 0870 and 0845 calls I made in July have not been charged (or is it a purposely misleading information for me to continue being charged for those calls?!!). The company did not address this issue in their reply at all.

My payment for the bill will be on 22 August, am I really not willing for £53.50 for those 'free minutes' call? I hope you could give me advise on this.



  Editorial Comments


=================================

previously submitted Consumer Comments
[Important: Read Disclaimer]

I too hve had nothing but trouble with this company. One thing you should be aware of. When Cellular Operations blame Vodafone for mistakes, bare in mind that Vodafone OWN Cellular Operations. They brought them earlier this year. So send you complaint direct to the Chairman of Vodafone.
Mr S Pugh ... 27 September 2003

Please post your Consumer Comments on the
clik2complaints.co.uk Sounding Board