Published:
26/08/2002
Right of Reply email sent:
26/08/2002

COMPANY RIGHT OF REPLY

 

A Right of Reply email has been issued

Your Comments at
Bottom of Page



===========
Post your comments:

Consumer Comments

Share comments
and your experience of this company on the clik2complaints Sounding Board: Click Here

Carphone Warehouse
Farnham
Dedicated Page in the Public Domain
Complainant:
Mr N Walker
Town/City of Residence:
Southport

Wednesday, Aug 14 2002 09:38 PM
To: customer-care@cpw.co.uk; consumer@guardian.co.uk
Subject: Carphone Warehouse Complaint

Without Prejudice

August 14, 2002

Nicholas James Walker
Merseyside,

Mobile: XXXXXXX

Dear Sir or Madam,
I wish to bring to your attention the frustrating and time consuming experience I have endured since purchasing a Siemens SL45 phone from the Farnham branch of The Carphone Warehouse. The initial purchase was made on December 12th 2001 at a cost of 129 pounds plus a network connection deposit of 100. In May 2002 the display of the phone developed an irritating line fault, which meant that characters displayed were unclear or unreadable, other than this the phone was in perfect working order. I returned the phone to your Farnham branch and was told that it would be sent to your service center for repair and would be returned within two weeks. Two weeks later I was informed that the phone had been returned to the manufacturer and that it would be further two weeks before it was returned. The phone was eventually returned with a letter from CPW explaining that the fault had been caused by liquid damage and that the phone was beyond economical repair.

Due to the fact that I was unable to prove otherwise how the fault may have developed I accepted the CPW findings, although on contacting Siemens I was told that they had never received or examined the phone. The CPW repair center had however damaged the casing on the phone during their four-week examination and had neglected to restore it to the condition in which it was received. Upon a further visit to the Farnham branch the phone was again sent away for repair, two more weeks passed, this time the repair had was only completed on half the casing, so again the phone was returned to the CPW repair center and another two weeks passed. When the phone was finally returned it had been smashed in transit so the CPW offered a reconditioned phone of the same specification. The new phone arrived in the Farnham store a couple of days later. This latest phone has the following faults:

a) the buttons on the side of the phone used to control the mp3 player do not work

b) the main dial button works intermittently

c) the battery only last for a few hours

d) there is a double stress fracture on the side casing where the phone has been opened in the past.


The CPW customer care team now tells me that my only course of action is to return the phone to the CPW repair center. In the 8 months since I purchased the phone I have been without it for over 8 weeks. I now face the prospect of repeating the saga ad infinitum.

I have written directly to CPW outlining my dissatisfaction as well as sending email and filling in your customer satisfaction questionnaire, I have yet to receive any response, although I have received several duplicate questionnaires, I assume one for each of the three times that the phone has been returned for repair. On contacting your service center I was repeatedly told that the repair process is my only course of action. All requests for a refund, new phone or even to talk to somebody in authority were met with disregard, in effect I was told to go away and put up with the problem.

To summarise I have been without a phone for over 8 weeks, you damaged and then destroyed my original phone, you have provided me with a faulty replacement and finally you have offered polite but blunt customer service. I want to inform you that CPW are the worst company I have ever had the misfortune to purchase any product or service from. I will offer this opinion to anyone that asks me about my experience with CPW.

Yours Faithfully
Nick Walker

click here to read Carphone's response to above and subsequent exchanges.


Links to other Carephone Complaints: Link1;Link2



  Editorial Comments

Carphone Warehouse did respond to Mr Walker's email above. But he is obviously not satisfied hence the posting here. Click Here to read the emails exchanged and then form your own judgement.

Comments are welcome.
update on 26 August 2002 click here for latest



=================================

previously submitted Consumer Comments
[Important: Read Disclaimer]

I am having the same problem with the same company. I gave them to small claims court.My case is in December.Is there any body have small court case result as a sample? Please tell me (ynernek@Yahoo.co.uk) Yucel...27 October 2002
----------------------------------------------------
Dear Carphone Warehouse, In conclusion of my letter to you, dated February 28th03, in which no reply was received. I am herby today writing to complain about the service that Carphone Warehouse provides. I received a Pay as you go, Motorola T191, purchased by my father at the Unit B, Whiteknights Centre, Shinfield Road, Reading branch, on December 14th 02, along with extra text messaging services and free calls.

However, I discovered a technical fault with the phone in February and took the phone to be repaired, not knowing I would be without a phone for 3 weeks, I was left with a Sim card and no phone to use my 5 free texts a day and free calls. I found this service terrible as after 3 weeks of no phone I was given a new Motorola T191, as there was a manufactured fault with the phone. After just 2 months of purchasing this phone this was unexpected, as a phone should not brake after this short period of time. Nevertheless, my recent phone has now been in repairs from July 18th 03 ( repair log: 209xxxx ), as the phone wouldn’t switch on, as the charger was too loose for the phone to charge, and the battery was loose producing, unreadable text on the screen.

My father has contacted Carphone Warehouse on numerous occasions, quoting about my faulty mobile phone. He also was not happy with the fact that I was being given replacements that were also faulty. However nothing seems to be done about the fact that I have had no phone for an overall of just under 2 months, I have a Sim card with texts that have been paid for but cant be used, and in 6 months I have had 2 new phones due to them having manufactured faults with them.

As you can see I am a very unhappy customer, and I don’t understand why the repairing process takes so long if all I receive is a brand new phone, which the same will occur too. It must be understandable that I need a Mobile phone for emergencies and personal contacts, also a phone wasn’t even offered to me while my phone was being replaced. I have not yet heard any information referring to my phone in repairs recently, so 3 weeks on I am requesting a refund for the phone and additional accessories, which were lost. I am not hesitant in taking this investigation further if my matters are not taken into consideration and some eligible actions are imposed.

Concluding this query, I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Miss Rachel Vickery .. 18 August 2003

Editor' s Note:
Click here for Carphone Warehouse response
-------------------------------------------------------
I've met with similar appalling service from the Carphone Warehouse.
I brought a new phone in April with a faulty ringtone/vibrate function. It's been for repair, which didn't fix it. It was then replaced with an 'as new' phone with a very similar fault. I could publish a book with the correspondence that's taken place. I've been in touch with Trading Standards, who were very helpful, and have also contacted Watchdog. I'm disgusted with their attitude.
Daniel Weir ... 28 August 2003
----------------------------------------
Dear Sir / Madam,to say that I am disgusted at your repair service is
an understatement.I first put my phone in for repair on 26th August 2003, having purchased it in January 2003. I made it quite clear that I NEEDED the phone returned to me within your 14-day 'repair promise' time limit of 14 days as I was travelling to the USA. This did not happen, and as you do not supply tri-band loan phones I had to travel to the USA without a phone, paying line rental and having no phone to use. On my return I collected the phone on 20th September, so on this occasion you had my phone for almost 1 month.

The phone came back with it's original fault plus another one courtesy of your repair service. When I gave you my phone for repair the fault was that when ending a call the phone would go onto hold, when trying to cancel the hold and clear the call the phone would then switch itself off. This fault was still on my phone, but after your so-called repair, now the speed keys didn't work. So I gave it to you to repair it with one fault, you supposedly repaired it and gave it back to me with 2 faults! I returned my phone to you for repair again on 27th September, again you have breached your 14-day 'repair promise'. This time it has taken 18 days to repair my phone, (I have not collected yet but I will today), yes I agree that you gave me a 10 gift voucher the last time, but what good is that to me? Can I pay my line rental with it?

I purchased the tri-band phone solely for travel to the USA, not because it's fashionable. I'm receiving medical treatment in the USA because our NHS service is appalling, most of the services in the UK are appalling and that goes for your repair service too. When I got my phone back the first time I paid 1.50 for a ringtone of my choice and 1.50 for a logo, this was just putting my phone back to how it looked and sounded when I gave it to you for repair. I will go through this process again when I get my phone back. Coupled with the petrol to and from the store yet again I am out of pocket. I do not particularly want your 'goodwill' gesture of a 10 gift voucher, in fact I gave the last one away, I want you to compensate me.

I am legally entitled to compensation and look forward to your proposal within the next 5 days (not working days), if you fail to respond I shall have no alternative but to issue a county court summons against you without further reference to you.If you check your records I sued you approximately 3 years ago and I shall have no hesitation whatsoever in issuing the threatened summons.
Infuriated Marie Sanchez, London... 16 October 2003
------------------------------------------
In September 2003 my girlfriend bought me a Nokia bluetooth headset for my birthday.
The headset did not seem to work properly, the battery life was around 30 minutes, the range was nowhere near that stated in the accompanying literature and the device disconnected from the handset on a random basis.

On September 27th 2003 my girlfriend returned the headset to Carphone Warehouse in Gunwharfe Quays, Portsmouth and requested a full refund on the basis that the device was faulty.

She was informed that CPW do not give refunds on Bluetooth Headsets. I went to the store myself and asked for a refund under my consumer rights. I was told the same thing. I asked where this information was publicly displayed for my girlfriend to see before she made the purchase. I was given a leaflet and told that the information was inside.

I contacted CPW head office and was told that the policy was not to give refunds on headsets, whether faulty or not. I was then cut off by the person I was talking to. I contacted Portsmouth City Council Trading Standards Department who sent me an information pack that I should follow, which I did.
I wrote to both the store in question and CPW head office stating that I was legally entitled to reject the item and claim a refund. I gave 14 days for them to reply. After three weeks, I wrote again and sent the letters by recorded delivery. I received no reply to these either.

We have been to the store again who have now claimed that at forst we just said that we didn't like the headset and did not state that it was faulty, and on another occasion that we did not return it within 14 days of the original purchase. We do, however, have witnesses who are prepared to make statements on our behalf and my mobile phone bill shows the exact date and time that I called CPW head office.

They did offer us a repair or credit note "as a gesture of good will". We find this, along with the total lack of customer service and dishonesty we have encountered to be an insult and are now taking legal advice with regards to obtaining a refund of 64 through the small claims court. I would be keen to know if anyone else has a similar experience or have taken CPW to court previously. Michael Bourne ...30 December 2003

Please post your Consumer Comments on the
clik2complaints.co.uk Sounding Board